home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1994-10-27 | 60.8 KB | 1,739 lines |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group A. Cooper
- Request for Comments: 1386 J. Postel
- December 1992
- The US Domain
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
- not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is
- unlimited.
-
- Table of Contents
-
- 1. Introduction ................................................ 2
- 1.1 The Internet Domain Name System......................... 2
- 1.2 Top Level Domains....................................... 3
- 1.3 The US Domain .......................................... 4
- 2. Naming Structure ............................................ 4
- 2.1 State Codes ............................................ 5
- 2.2 City Codes or Locality Names............................ 5
- 2.3 Examples of Names....................................... 5
- 3. Registration ................................................ 8
- 3.1 Requirements ........................................... 8
- 3.2 Direct Entries ......................................... 9
- 3.2.1 UUCP Hosts .......................................... 9
- 3.2.2 Non-IP Hosts ........................................ 10
- 3.3 Delegated Subdomains ................................... 12
- 3.3.1 Schools ............................................. 12
- 3.3.2 State Agencies ...................................... 14
- 3.3.3 Federal Agencies .................................... 14
- 3.3.4 Delegation Requirement............................... 14
- 3.3.5 Delegation Procedures ............................... 15
- 3.3.6 Subdomain Contacts................................... 18
- 4. Database Information......................................... 19
- 4.1 Name Servers ........................................... 19
- 4.2 Zone files ............................................. 20
- 4.3 Resource Records ....................................... 21
- 4.3.1 A Records ........................................... 22
- 4.3.2 CNAME Records ....................................... 22
- 4.3.3 MX Records .......................................... 22
- 4.3.4 HINFO Records ....................................... 23
- 4.3.5 PTR Records ......................................... 23
- 4.4 Wildcards .............................................. 23
- 5. References .................................................. 24
- 6. Security Considerations ..................................... 25
- 7. Author's Address ............................................ 25
- Appendix-I: US Domain Names BNF................................. 26
- Appendix-II: US Domain Questionnaire for Host Entry.............. 28
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 1]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 1. INTRODUCTION
-
- 1.1 The Internet Domain Name System
-
- The Domain Name System (DNS) provides for the translation between
- host names and addresses. Within the Internet, this means
- translating from a name such as "venera.isi.edu", to an IP address
- such as "128.9.0.32". The DNS is a set of protocols and databases.
- The protocols define the syntax and semantics for a query language to
- ask questions about information located by DNS-style names. The
- databases are distributed and replicated. There is no dependence on
- a single central server, and each part of the database is provided in
- at least two servers.
-
- The assignment of the 32-bit IP addresses is a separate activity. IP
- addresses are assigned by the Network Information Center
- (Hostmaster@NIC.DDN.MIL).
-
- In addition to translating names to addresses for hosts that are on
- the Internet, the DNS provides for registering DNS-style names for
- other hosts reachable (via electronic mail) through gateways or mail
- relays. The records for such name registration point to an Internet
- host (one with an IP address) that acts as a mail forwarder for the
- registered host. For example, the host "bah.rochester.ny.us" is
- registered in the DNS with a pointer to the mail relay
- "relay1.uu.net". This type of pointer is called an MX record.
-
- This gives electronic mail users a uniform mail addressing syntax and
- avoids making users aware of the underlying network boundaries.
-
- The reason for the development of the domain system was growth in the
- Internet. The host name to address mappings were maintained by the
- Network Information Center (NIC) in a single file, called HOSTS.TXT,
- which was FTPed by all the hosts on the Internet. The network
- population was changing in character. The timeshared hosts that made
- up the original ARPANET were being replaced with local networks of
- workstations. Local organizations were administering their own names
- and addresses, but had to wait for the NIC to make changes in
- HOSTS.TXT to make the changes visible to the Internet at large.
- Organizations also wanted some local structure on the name space.
- The applications on the Internet were getting more sophisticated and
- creating a need for general purpose name service. The idea of a
- hierarchical name space, with the hierarchy roughly corresponding to
- organizational structure, and names using "." as the character to
- mark the boundary between hierarcy levels. A design using a
- distributed database and generalized resources was implemented.
-
- The domain system provides standard formats for resource data,
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 2]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- standard methods for querying the database, and standard methods for
- name servers to refresh local data from other name servers.
-
- 1.2 Top-Level Domains
-
- The top-level domains in the DNS are EDU, COM, GOV, MIL, ORG, INT,
- and NET, and all the 2-letter country codes from the list of
- countries in ISO-3166.
-
- Even though the intention was that any educational institution any
- where in the world could be registered under the EDU domain, in
- practice it has turned out with few exceptions only those in the
- United States have registered under EDU, similiary with COM (for
- commercial). In other countries, everything is registered under the
- 2-letter country code, often with some subdivision. For example, in
- Korea (KR) the second level names are AC for academic community, CO
- for commercial, GO for government, and RE for research. However each
- country may go it's own way about organizing its domain, and many
- have.
-
- Their are no plans of putting all of the organizational domains .EDU
- .GOV .COM etc., under .US.
-
- However, there are some states registered in the .GOV domain (11 by 2
- letter code), and 3 by full names)
-
- ca.gov la.gov ohio.gov va.gov
- co.gov md.gov or.gov wa.gov
- hawaii.gov nc.gov sc.gov
- ia.gov ny.gov texas.gov
-
- Other names sometimes appear as top-level domain names. Some people
- have made up names in the DNS style without coordinating or
- registering with the DNS management. Some names that typically
- appear are ".BITNET", ".UUCP", and two-letter codes for continents,
- such as ".NA" for North America (this conflicts with the official
- Internet code for Namibia).
-
- For example, the DNS style name "KA7EEJ.CO.USA.NA" is used in the
- amateur radio network. These addresses are never supposed to show up
- on the Internet but they do occasionally. The amateur radio network
- people created their own naming scheme, and it interferes sometimes
- with Internet addresses.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 3]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 1.3 The US Domain
-
- The US Domain is an official top-level domain in the DNS of the
- Internet community. It is registered with the Network Information
- Center. The domain administrators are Jon Postel and Ann Westine
- Cooper at the Information Sciences Institute of the University of
- Southern California (USC-ISI).
-
- US is the ISO-3166 2-letter country code for the United States and
- thus the US Domain is established as a top-level domain and
- registered with the NIC the same way other country domains are.
-
- Because organizations in the United States have registered primarily
- in the EDU and COM domains, little use was initially made of the US
- domain.
-
- In the past, the computers registered in the US Domain were primarily
- owned by small companies or individuals with computers at home.
- However, the US Domain has grown and currently registers hosts in
- federal government agencies, state government agencies, K12 schools,
- community colleges, private schools, libraries, county agencies, and
- city utilities, to name a few.
-
- The administration of the US Domain was managed solely by the Domain
- Registrar in the past. However, due to the increase of hosts,
- administration of subdomains is being delegated to others.
-
- Any computer in the United States may be registered in the US Domain.
-
- 2. NAMING STRUCTURE
-
- The US Domain hierarchy is based on political geography. The
- namespace under .US is the state namespace, then the city namespace,
- then organization or computer name and so on.
-
- For example:
-
- SPK.WA.US
- VANC.WA.US
-
- There is of course no problem with running out of names.
-
- The things that are named are individual computers.
-
- If you register now in one city and then move, the database can be
- updated with a new name in your new city, and a pointer can be set up
- from your old name to your new name. This type of pointer is called
- a CNAME record.
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 4]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- The use of un-registered names is not effective and causes problems
- for other users. Inventing your own name and using it without
- registering is not a good idea.
-
- 2.1 State Codes
-
- The state codes are the two letter US Postal abbreviations.
-
- 2.2 City Codes or Locality Names
-
- Cities may be named (designated) by their full name (spelled out with
- hyphens replacing spaces (e.g., Los-Angeles or New-York)), or by a
- city code. The first choice is the full city name, the second choice
- is the city codes from Western Union's "City Mnemonics" list, and a
- third choice is a code for your city chosen by the applicant.
- However, it is very desirable that all users in the same city use the
- same designator for the city.
-
- Abbreviated city names are a good idea, particularly when the city
- name is long, as there is much to type already. One of the problems
- is that the city codes in the Western Union City Mnemonics list are
- sometimes not very good abbreviations. Users sometimes tend to
- prefer abbreviations that are commonly used already from that region.
- Such as SF for San Francisco, MPK for Menlo Park.
-
- Exceptions have been made in the abbreviations, even though this
- causes extra work to keep track of these abbreviations. One
- abbreviation for one city. Applicants are told what codes are
- currently in use, however, if a city code is not used yet, and they
- would prefer to use a different code that is more common among the
- natives, then the new code is allowed. However, once it's
- registered, then everyone else who registers in that city will have
- to use that code or spell out the full city name.
-
- Some applicants have tried to get a copy of the Western Union City
- Mnemonics code list but it is no longer available from Western Union.
- However, we do have a copy but it is not online. If you are
- requesting an abbreviated city code please let us know and we will
- gladly look it up for you.
-
- 2.3 Examples of Names
-
- For small entities like individuals or small businesses there is
- usually no problem with selecting locality based names.
-
- For example: Zuckys.Santa-Monica.CA.US
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 5]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- For large entities like large corporations with multiple facilities
- in several cities or states this often seems like a unreasonable
- constraint (especially when compared with the alternative of
- registering directly in the .COM domain). However, a company does
- have a headquarters office in a particular locality and so could
- register with that name.
-
- For example: IBM.Armonk.NY.US
-
-
- EXAMPLES OF THE NAMING STRUCTURE IN THE US DOMAIN
-
- PRIVATE (business or individual)
- ================================
-
- Camp-Curry.Yosemite.CA.US <==== a business
- IBM.Armonk.NY.US <==== a business
- Dogwood.atl.GA.US <==== a business
- Geo-Petrellis.Culver-City.CA.US <==== a restaurant
- Zuckys-Santa-Monica.CA.US <==== a restaurant
- Joe-Josts.Long-Beach.CA.US <==== a bar
- Holodek.Santa-Cruz.CA.US <==== a personal computer
-
- FEDERAL
- =======
-
- Senate.FED.US <==== US Senate
- DOD.FED.US <==== US Defense Dept.
- DOT.FED.US <==== US Transportation Dept.
- USPS.FED.US <==== US Postal Service
- VA.FED.US <==== US Veterans Administration
- IRS.FED.US <==== US Internal Revenue Service
- Yosemite.NPS.Interior.FED.US <==== a federal agency
-
- STATE
- =====
-
- Senate.STATE.MN.US <==== state Senate
- House.STATE.MN.US <==== state House of Reps
- MDH.STATE.MN.US <==== state Health Dept.
- HUD.STATE.CA.US <==== state House and Urban Dev. Dept.
- DOT.STATE.MN.US <==== state Transportation Dept.
- Caltrans.STATE.CA.US <==== state Transportation Dept.
- DMV.STATE.CA.US <==== state Motor Vehicles Dept.
- Culver-City.DMV.STATE.CA.US <==== a local office of DMV
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 6]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- CITY | COUNTY
- ==============
-
- Police.CITY.Culver-City.CA.US <==== a city department
- Fire-Dept.CITY.Los-Angeles.CA.US <==== a city department
- Fire-Dept.COUNTY.Los-Angeles.CA.US <==== a county department
-
- REGIONAL | DISTRICT | LIBRARY
- =============================
-
- SCAQMD.DISTRICT.CA.US <==== a regional district
- Bunker-Hill-Improvement.DISTRICT.LA.CA.US <==== a local district
-
- Huntington.LIB.LA.US <==== a private library
- Venice.LA-City.LIB.CA.US <==== a city library
- MDR.LA-County.LIB.CA.US <==== a county library
-
- K12 | CC | STATE UNIV | PRIVATE SCHOOLS
- =======================================
-
- Los-Angeles.UC.STATE.CA.US <==== UCLA
- Berkeley.UC.STATE.CA.US <==== "CAL"
- Irvine.UC.STATE.CA.US <==== University of Calif. Irvine
- Santa-Cruz.UC.STATE.CA.US <==== University of Calif. Santa Cruz
- Northridge.CSU.STATE.CA.US <==== Calif. State. Univ. Northridge
- Fullerton.CSU.STATE.CA.US <==== Calif. State. Univ. Fullerton
- Sonoma.CSU.STATE.CA.US <==== Calif. State. Univ. Sonoma
-
- SMCC.Santa-Monica.CC.CA.US <==== a public community college
- Trade-Tech.Los-Angeles.CC.CA.US <==== a public community college
-
- Hamilton.High.LA-Unified.K12.CA.US <==== a public K12 school
- Sherman-Oaks.Elem.LA-Unified.K12.CA.US <==== a public K12 school
- John-Muir.Middle.Santa-Monica.K12.CA.US <==== a public K12 school
-
- St-Monica.High.Santa-Monica.CA.US <==== a private high school
- St-Monica.Elem.Santa-Monica.CA.US <==== a private elem. school
- Crossroads-School.Santa-Monica.CA.US <==== a private school
- Mary-Ellens.Montessori-School.LA.CA.US <==== a private school
- Leland-Stanford-Jr-Univ.Stanford.CA.US <==== a private school
- Loyola-Marymount-Univ.Los-Angeles.CA.US <==== a private school
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 7]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- When appropriate, subdomains are delegated and partioned in various
- categories, such as:
-
- K12.<state>.US = kindegarten thru 12th grade
- CC.<state>.US = community colleges
- LIB.<state>.US = libraries
- STATE.<state>.US = state government agencies
- <org-name>.FED.US = federal government agencies
-
- The Appendix-I contains the current US Domain Names BNF, but in
- actuality, the names under these subdomains may vary according to the
- decision of the administrators of these subdomains.
-
- Some users would like names associated with a greater metropolitan
- area or region like the "Bay Area" or "Tri-Cities". One problem with
- this is that these names are not necessarily unique within a state.
- The best thing to do in this case is to use the larger metropolitan
- city in your host name. Cities and in some cases counties are used.
-
- 3. REGISTRATION
-
- 3.1 Requirements
-
- Anyone requesting to register a host in the US Domain is sent a copy
- of the US Domain policy and procedure, and must fill out a US Domain
- questionnaire.
-
- The US Domain template, is similar to the NIC Domain template
- however, it is not the same. To request a copy of the US Domain
- questionnaire, send a message to the US Domain registrar (us-
- domain@isi.edu).
-
- Note: If you are registering a name in a delegated zone
- (see Section 3.3.6). Please register with the
- contact for that zone.
-
- The key people must have electronic mailboxes (that work). Please
- provide all the information indicated in the "Administrator" and
- "Technical Contact" slot. This person will be the point of contact
- for any administrative and policy questions about the domain.
-
- The administrator is usually the person who manages the organization
- being registered. The technical contact can also be administrator, or
- the systems person, or someone who is familiar with the technical
- details of the Internet. The technical contact should have a valid
- working e-mail address. This is necessary in case something goes
- wrong.
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 8]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- It is important that your "Return-Path" and "From" field indicate an
- Internet style address. UUCP style addresses such as "host1!user"
- will not work. This is fine within the UUCP world, but not the
- Internet. If you want people on the Internet to be able to send mail
- to you, your return path needs to be an Internet style address: such
- as host1!user@internet.gateway.host or user@internet.gateway.host.
-
- It is also possible to register through one of the Internet service
- providers that have established working relationships with the US
- domain administrator.
-
- If everything checks out, turn around time for registering a host is
- usually a day or two. The nameservers are updated anywhere from 12
- to 24 hours later.
-
- There are two ways to be registered in the US Domain, directly, or by
- delegation.
-
- 3.2 Direct Entries
-
- Direct entry in the database of the US Domain appeals most to
- individuals and small companies. Fill out the application and send
- it directly to the US Domain administrator. If you are in an area
- where the zone is delegated to someone else your request will be
- forwarded to the zone administrator for your registration.
-
- 3.2.1 UUCP Hosts
-
- Many applicants have hosts in the UUCP world. Some are one hop away,
- some two and three hops away from their "Internet Forwarder", this is
- ok. What is important is getting an Internet host to be your
- forwarder. If you do not already have an Internet forwarder, there
- are several businesses that provide this service for a fee, such as
- UUNET.UU.NET (postmaster@uunet.uu.net), PSI (postmaster@UU2.PSI.COM)
- and CERFNET (help@cerf.net). Sometimes local colleges in your area
- are already on the Internet and may be willing to act as an Internet
- Forwarder. You would need to work this out with the systems
- administrator we cannot make these arrangements for you.
-
- Although we work with UUCP service providers, the Internet US Domain
- registration is not affiliated with the registration of UUCP Map
- entries. The UUCP map entry does not provide us with sufficient
- information. If you do not have a copy of the US Domain
- questionnaire template, please send a message to: us-domain@isi.edu
- and request one. See Appendix-II.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 9]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- This is not an appropriate registration for the US Domain.
-
- #N starl
- #S Amiga 2500; AmigaDOS 2.04; Dillon's AmigaUUCP 1.15D
- #O Starlight BBS
- #C Stephen Baker
- #E starl!sbaker
- #T +1 305 378 1161
- #P 1107 SW 200th St #303B Miami, Fl. 33157
- #L 25 47 N / 88 10 W [city]
- #R
- #U mthvax
- #W starl!sbaker (Stephen Baker); Mon Feb 24 19:58:24 EST 1992
- starl mthvax(DAILY)
-
- If you are registering your host as a central site for a USENET group
- where other UUCP sites will feed from you, that's fine. These UUCP
- sites do not need to register. If however, the other sites become a
- subdomain of your hostname, then we will need to register them
- individually or add a wildcard record.
-
- For example: bah.rochester.ny.us
- host1.bah.rochester.ny.us
- host2.bah.rochester.ny.us
-
- 3.2.2 NON-IP Hosts
-
- To use US Domain names for non-IP hosts, there must be a forwarder
- host that is an IP host. There must be an adminstrative agreement
- and a technical procedure for relaying mail between the non-IP host
- and the forwarder host.
-
- Case 1:
- -------
-
- Your host is not an IP host but does talk directly with a host that
- is an IP host.
- +-----------------+
- +----------+ +---------+ | |
- |your-host |---UUCP-----|forwarder|----IP/TCP--| INTERNET |
- +----------+ +---------+ | |
- +-----------------+
- "Forwarder" must be an IP host on the Internet.
-
- You must ask "forwarder" if they are willing to be the internet
- forwarder for "your-host".
-
- In the US Domain of the DNS data base there must be an entry like
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 10]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- this:
- "your-host" MX 10 "forwarder"
-
- This must be entered by the US Domain administrator.
-
- In the "forwarder" routing tables there must be information about
- "your-host" with a rule like: If I see mail for "your-host" I will
- send it via uucp by calling phone number "123-4567".
-
- Case 2:
- -------
-
- In this case your hosts talks to another host that ... that talks to
- an IP host. In other words, there are multiple hops between your host
- and the Internet.
- +-----------------+
- +----------+ +---------+ | |
- |path-host |---UUCP-----|forwarder|----IP/TCP--| INTERNET |
- +----------+ +---------+ | |
- | +-----------------+
- UUCP
- |
- +----------+
- |your-host |
- +----------+
-
- "Forwarder" must be an IP host on the internet.
-
- You must ask "forwarder" if they are willing to be the Internet
- Forwarder for "Your-Host". You must ask "path-host" to relay your
- mail.
-
- In the US Domain of the DNS DataBase there must be an entry like this:
-
- "your-host" MX 10 "forwarder"
-
- This must be entered by the US Domain Administrator.
-
- In the "forwarder" routing tables there must be information about
- "your-host" with a rule like: If I see mail for "your-host" I will
- send it via UUCP to "path-host" by calling phone number "123-4567".
- and "path-host" must also know how to relay the mail to "your-host".
-
- Note: It is assumed that "path-host" is already MXed to "forwarder".
- It is not appropriate to ask to MX "your-host" to "path-host" (this
- is sometimes called double MXing). The host on the right hand side
- of an MX entry must be a host on the Internet with an IP address
- (e.g., 128.9.2.32).
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 11]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 3.3 Delegated Subdomains
-
- The administrator of the US Domain is responsible for the assignment
- of all the DNS names that end with ".US". Of course, one person or
- even one group can't handle all this in the long run so portions of
- the name space are delegated to others.
-
- Delegation of cities, companies within cities, schools (K12),
- community colleges (CC), libraries (LIB), state government (STATE),
- and federal government agencies, departments, etc., is acceptable and
- practical.
-
- For a delegated portion of the namespace, for example a city, no
- alterations can be made to that name, no abbreviations added, etc.
- unless applied for.
-
- Sometimes there may be two people running name servers in the same
- city because different portions of the name space has been delegated
- to them. For example, someone may be delegated the <city>.<state>.US
- name space, and someone else from a state government agency may have
- the .STATE.<state>.US, portion. For example, Fred may run the name
- servers for Sacramento.CA.US and Joe may run the name servers for
- STATE.CA.US in Sacramento.
-
- If a company would like to have wildcard records added, or run their
- own name servers in a city that we have delegated name space to, this
- is ok.
-
- Delegation of the whole State namespace is not yet implemented. The
- delegated part of the name space is in the form of:
-
- .STATE.<state>.US.
- .K12.<state>.US.
- .CC.<state>.US.
- .LIB.<state>.US.
- .<org-name>.<city>.<state>.US.
- .CITY.<city-name>.<state>.US.
- .<org-name>.FED.US.
-
- 3.3.1 Schools
-
- As schools begin to join the Internet, there ought to be a consistent
- scheme for naming them. A "K12" name branch has been established in
- each state in the US Domain for this purpose.
-
- Public schools are usually organized by districts which can be larger
- or smaller than a city or county.
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 12]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- It makes sense to name schools within districts. However districts
- often have the same name as a city or county so there has to be a way
- to distinguish a public school district name from some other type of
- locality name. The keyword "K12" is used for this.
-
- In some districts, the same school name is used at different levels,
- for example, Washington Elementary School and Washington High School.
- We suggest that when necessary the keywords "Elementary", "Middle",
- and "High" be used to distinguish these schools. These keywords
- would only be used when they are needed, if the school's name is
- unique without such keywords don't use them.
-
- Typical K12 school names currently used are like:
-
- IVY.PRS.K12.NJ.US
- DMHS.JCPS.K12.KY.US
- OHS.EUNION.K12.CA.US
- BOHS.BREA.K12.CA.US
-
- These names could be long. Given the large number of schools,
- organizing by school district and state seems appropriate. When
- there are many things to name some of the names must be long.
-
- In some cases there may be appropriate abbreviations that can be
- used. For example Hamilton High School in Los Angeles could be:
-
- Hami.Hi.LA.K12.CA.US
-
- Some School Examples:
- ---------------------
-
- Hamilton.High.LA-Unified.K12.CA.US <== a public school
- Sherman-Oaks.Elem.LA-Unified.K12.CA.US <== a public school
- John-Muir.Middle.Santa-Monica.K12.CA.US <== a public school
- Crossroads-School.Santa-Monica.CA.US <== a private school
- SMCC.CC.CA.US <== a community college
- Northridge.CSU.STATE.CA.US <== a state university
-
- If a school has a bunch of PCs, then each PC should have a name.
- Suppose they are named "alpha", "beta", ... then if they belong to a
- school named "Lincoln.High.Lakewood.K12.CA.US" their names would be:
-
- alpha.Lincoln.High.Lakewood.K12.CA.US.
- beta.Lincoln.High.Lakewood.K12.CA.US
- ...
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 13]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 3.2.2 State Agencies
-
- US Domain namespace has been delegated to the state goverment
- agencies. For example, in the State of Minnesota, the subdomain is
- STATE.MN.US
-
- This means that the person running the namservers for state.mn.us are
- responsible for naming agencies, of the state govermnent. For
- example:
-
- State Agencies:
- ---------------
-
- Senate.STATE.MN.US <== State Senate
- MDH.STATE.MN.US <== Dept. of Health
- CALTRANS.STATE.CA.US <== Dept. of Transportation
- DMV.STATE.CA.US <== Dept. of Motor Vehicles
-
- 3.3.3 Federal Agencies
-
- A federal namespace has been delegated to the federal government
- agencies. For example the subdomain for the Federal Reserve Bank of
- Minneapolis is MNPL.FRB.FED.US. Other examples are listed below.
-
- Federal Government Agencies:
- ---------------------------
-
- Senate.FED.US <==== US Senate
- DOD.FED.US <==== US Defense Dept.
- USPS.FED.US <==== US Postal Service
- VA.FED.US <==== US Veterans Administration
- IRS.FED.US <==== US Internal Revenue Service
- Yosemite.NPS.Interior.FED.US <==== A Federal agency
-
- 3.3.4 Delegation Requirements
-
- When a subdomain is delegated, the following requirements must be
- met:
-
- 1) There must be a knowledgeable and competent technical contact,
- familiar with the Internet Domain Name System. This
- requirement is easily satisified if the technical contact
- already runs some other nameservers.
-
- 2) Organizations requesting delegations must provide at least two
- independent (robust and reliable) DNS name servers in
- physically separate locations on the Internet.
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 14]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 3) The subdomain must accept all applicants on an equal basis.
-
- 4) The subdomain must provide timely processing of requests. To
- do this it is helpful to have several individuals
- knowledgeable about the procedures so that the operations are
- not delayed due to one persons unavailability (for example by
- being on vacation).
-
- 3.3.5 Delegation Procedures
-
- The procedure that is followed when a subdomain is delegated includes
- the following steps:
-
- 1) Evaluate the technical contact's experience with DNS. Make
- sure there is a need for the proposed delegation. Make sure
- the technical contact has the information about the US Domain
- and the suggested naming structure.
-
- 2) Note: In the past there was the concept of a "coordinator" for
- a group or a club or "Domain Park". They would arrange to
- coordinate the registration of all the computers used by
- members of the club and forward all the information for the
- group to the US Domain Administrator. Most coordinators have
- moved into the position of administrator of that now delegated
- subdomain.
-
- 3) Add the new technical contact to the "us-dom-adm" mailing list
- for distributing updates to the US Domain policies and
- procedures, or other pertinent information.
-
- 4) Delete any hosts from our zone file that belongs in the newly
- delegated subdomain and make sure they now have the hosts in
- their zone file.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 15]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 5) Send them a copy of the zone file so their initial zone file
- is identical to ours. For example:
-
- mil.wi.us. 86400 SOA spool.mu.edu. manager.spool.mu.edu. (
- 920904 ;serial
- 28800 ;refresh
- 14400 ;retry
- 3600000 ;expire
- 86400 ) ;minim
-
- mil.wi.us. 86400 NS spool.mu.edu.
- spool.mu.edu. 50400 A 134.48.1.31
- mil.wi.us. 86400 NS sophie.mscs.mu.edu.
-
- sophie.mscs.mu.edu. 50400 A 134.48.4.6
- solaria.mil.wi.us. 86400 HINFO Sun 3/60 SunOs
- solaria.mil.wi.us. 86400 MX 10 spool.mu.edu.
- nthomas.mil.wi.us. 86400 HINFO 386 Clone DOS
- nthomas.mil.wi.us. 86400 MX 10 spool.mu.edu.
- rwmke.mil.wi.us. 86400 HINFO UNIX PC UNIX
- rwmke.mil.wi.us. 86400 MX 10 spool.mu.edu.
- milestn.mil.wi.us. 86400 HINFO PC AT ENIX
- milestn.mil.wi.us. 86400 MX 10 spool.mu.edu.
- dawley.mil.wi.us. 86400 HINFO 386 Clone DOS
- dawley.mil.wi.us. 86400 MX 10 spool.mu.edu.
- ...
- -------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 16]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 6) The US Domain zone file must have the following records,
- showing the name, address, e-mail, and phone number of the
- technical contact for the delegated subdomain and the name of
- the delegated name space and the names of the nameservers.
-
- ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
- ;
- ;Delegated zone: .mil.wi.us
- ;Contact: Steven Goodman
- ; manager@spool.mu.edu
- ; Marquette University
- ; (414) 288-6734
-
- mil.wi.us. 604800 NS SPOOL.MU.EDU.
- 604800 NS SOPHIE.MSCS.MU.EDU.
-
- ; A glue record is not needed this time. Glue records are
- ; needed when the name of the server is a subdomain of the
- ; delegated domain.
- ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
-
- 7) Check to see that delegated subdomain name servers are up and
- running, and make sure the delegated hosts are installed in
- their zone file. Now delete any hosts from the US Domain zone
- file that belongs in the newly delegated subdomain.
-
- 8) Inform the technical contact of the newly delegated subdomain
- that wildcard records are allowed in the zone file under the
- organizational subdomain but no wildcard records are allowed
- under the "city" or "state" domain.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 17]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 3.3.6 Subdomain Contacts
-
- Approximately 680 individual hosts are registered, but we have
- delegated the following portions of the namespace. We do not know
- how many hosts are registered under each of these subsdomains.
-
- DELEGATED ZONE CONTACT
- ============== =======
-
- TUCSON.AZ.US leonard@arizona.edu
- SF.CA.US sf-hostmaster@apple.com
- PREMENOS.SF.CA.US jenkins@premenos.sf.ca.us
- SCVL.CA.US sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us
- SANTA-CRUZ.CA.US sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us
- APTOS.CA.US sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us
- CAMPBELL.CA.US sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us
- CAPITOLA.CA.US sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us
- FELTON.CA.US sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us
- ZAYANTE.CA.US sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us
- BOULDER-CREEK.CA.US sinster@scintilla.capitola.ca.us
- DARWIN.PTVY.CA.US brian@angband.stanford.edu
- LOGAN-HS.UNIONCITY.CA.US cjw@marmot.nersc.gov
- BOULDER.CO.US trent@XOR.COM
- COLOSPGS.CO.US trent@XOR.COM
- DENVER.CO.US trent@XOR.COM
- DVR.CO.US trent@XOR.COM
- CHI.IL.US matt@oddjob.uchicago.edu
- EUGENE.OR.US meyer@oregon.uoregon.edu
- SPRINGFIELD.OR.US meyer@oregon.uoregon.edu
- MULTNOMAH.LIB.OR.US brianw@polaris.admin.ogi.edu
- PGH.PA.US ecd@CERT.ORG
- SPK.WA.US root@dogear.spk.wa.us
- MIL.WI.US manager@spool.mu.edu
- ATL.GA.US charvey@gatech.gatech.edu
- Mt-PARK.GA.US charvey@gatech.gatech.edu
- CLARKSTON.GA.US charvey@gatech.gatech.edu
- STATE.MN.US dfazio@mr.net
- MNPL.FRB.FED.US dfazio@mr.net
-
- K12.CA.US mdm@NIC.CSU.NET
- CC.CA.US mdm@NIC.CSU.NET
- K12.MI.US sandra.s.waite@um.cc.umich.edu
- K12.TX.US bmanning@is.rice.edu
- K12.NJ.US becker@nisc.jvnc.net
- K12.MS.US fwp@msstate.edu
- dmhs.jcps.K12.KY.US lentner@sura.net
- TIES.K12.MN.US dfazio@mr.net
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 18]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- The following MD.US counties have been delegated to
- (butler@brl.mil).
-
- AL.MD.US. Allegany
- AA.MD.US. Anne Arundel
- BA.MD.US. Baltimore
- CAL.MD.US. Calvert
- CAR.MD.US. Caroline
- CE.MD.US. Cecil
- CH.MD.US. Charles
- DO.MD.US. Dorchester
- FR.MD.US. Frederick
- GA.MD.US. Garrett
- HA.MD.US. Harford
- HO.MD.US. Howard
- KE.MD.US. Kent
- MO.MD.US. Montgomery
- PG.MD.US. Prince George"s
- QA.MD.US. Queen Anne's
- SM.MD.US. St. Mary's
- SO.MD.US. Somerset
- TA.MD.US. Talbot
- WA.MD.US. Washington
- WI.MD.US. Wicomico
- WO.MD.US. Worcester
-
- 4. DATABASE INFORMATION
-
- 4.1. Name Servers
-
- Name servers are the repositories of information that make up the
- domain database. The database is divided up into sections called
- zones, which are distributed among the name servers. While name
- servers can have several optional functions and sources of data, the
- essential task of a name server is to answer queries using data in
- its zones. The response to a query can always be generated using
- only local data, and either contains the answer to the question or a
- referral to other name servers "closer" to the desired information.
-
- A given zone will be available from several name servers to insure
- its availability in spite of host or communication link failure.
- Every zone is required to be available on at least two servers, and
- many zones have more redundancy than that.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 19]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- The US Domain is currently supported by six name servers.
-
- venera.isi.edu
- ns.isi.edu
- ns.hercules.csl.sri.com
- nnsc.nsf.net
- ns.uu.net
- adm.brl.mil
-
- 4.2 Zone Files
-
- A "zone" is a registry of domains kept by a particular organization.
- A zone registry is "authoritative", that is, the master copy of the
- registry is kept by the zone organization, and this copy is, by
- definition, always up-to-date. Copies of this registry may be
- distributed to other places and kept in caches, but these caches are
- not authoritative, and may be out-of-date.
-
- Every zone has at least one node, and hence domain name, for which it
- is authoritative, and all of the nodes in a particular zone are
- connected. Given the tree structure, every zone has a highest node
- which is closer to the root than any other node in the zone. The
- name of this node is often used to identify the zone. The data that
- describes a zone has four major parts:
-
- 1) Authoritative data for all nodes within the zone.
-
- 2) Data that defines the top node of the zone
- (can be thought of as part of the authoritative data).
-
- 3) Data that describes delegated subzones, i.e., cuts
- around the bottom of the zone,
-
- 4) Data that allows access to name servers for subzones
- (sometimes called "glue" data).
-
- The zone administrator has to maintain the zones at all the
- namservers which are authoritative for the zone. When the changes
- are made they must be distributed to all of the name servers.
-
- Copies of the zone files are not available unless you are on the
- Internet. To look at the zone files use the "dig" program of the DNS
- domain name system.
-
- dig @nshost host-your-checking axfr
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 20]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 4.3 Resource Records
-
- Records in the zone data files are called resource records (RRs).
- The standard Resource records (RR) are specified in STD 13, RFC 1034
- and STD 13, RFC 1035 (3,4). An RR has a standard format as shown.
-
- <name> [<ttl>] [<class>] <type> <data>
-
- The first field is always the name of the domain record. The second
- field is an optional time to live field. This specifies how long
- this data will be stored in the data base. The third field is the
- address class; the class field specifies the protocol group most
- often this is the Internet class "IN". The fourth field states the
- type of the resource record. The fields after that are dependent on
- the Type of RR. The fifth field is the data field which is defined
- differently for each type and class of data. Here is a list of the
- current commonly used types.
-
- SOA Start of Authority
- NS Name Server
- A Internet Address
- CNAME Canonical Name (nickname pointer)
- HINFO Host Information
- WKS Well Known Services
- MX Mail Exchanger
- PTR Pointer
-
- What do the fields mean?
-
- foo.LA.CA.US. 604800 MX 10 Venera.ISI.EDU.
- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
-
- 1) domain name
- 2) time to live information
- 3) mail exchanger record
- 4) preference value to determine (if more than one
- forwarder) which mailer to use first, lower number
- higher preference
- 5) the Internet forwarding host.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 21]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 4.3.1 A Records
-
- Internet (IP) Address. The data for an "A" record is an Internet
- address in a dotted decimal form. A sample "A" record might look
- like:
-
- venera.isi.edu. A 128.9.0.32
- (name) (A) (address)
-
- The name field is the machine name, and the address is the network
- address. There should be only one "A" record for each address of a
- host.
-
- 4.3.2 CNAME Records
-
- Canonical Name resource record, CNAME, specifies an alias for a
- canonical name. This is essentially a pointer to the official name
- for the requested name. All other RRs appear under this official
- name. A machine named FERNWOOD.MPK.CA.US may want to have the
- nickname ANTERIOR.MPK.CA.US. In that case, the following RR would be
- used:
-
- anterior.mpk.ca.us. CNAME fernwood.mpk.ca.us.
- (alias nickname) (canonical name)
-
- Nicknames (the name associated with the RR is the nickname) may be
- added for awhile when a host changes its name, usually because it
- moves to another state. It helps to have this CNAME pointer so if
- any mail comes to the old address it will get forwarded to the new
- one. There cannot be any other RRs associated with a nickname of the
- same class.
-
- 4.3.3 MX Records
-
- Mail Exchanger records, MX, are used to specify a machine that knows
- how to deliver mail to a machine that is not directly connected to
- the Internet. For example, venera.isi.edu is the mail gateway that
- knows how to deliver mail to foo.la.ca.us, but other machines on the
- network cannot deliver mail directly to foo.la.ca.us. These two
- machines may have a private connection or use a different transport
- medium (such as uucp). The preference value (10) is the order that a
- mailer should follow when there is more than one way to deliver mail
- to a single machine. The lower the number the higher the preference.
-
- foo.LA.CA.US. 604800 MX 10 Venera.ISI.EDU.
- foo.LA.CA.US. 604800 MX 20 relay1.uu.net.
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 22]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 4.3.4 HINFO Records
-
- Host information resource records, HINFO is for host specific data.
- This lists the hardware and operating system that are running at the
- listed host. It should be noted that a space separates the hardware
- information and the operating system information. If you want to
- include a space in the machine name you must quote the name. Host
- information is not specific to any class, so ANY may be used for the
- address class. There should be one HINFO record for each host.
-
- acb.la.ca.us. HINFO VAX-11/780 UNIX
- (Hardware) (Operating System)
-
- The official HINFO types can be found in the latest Assigned Numbers
- RFC, the most recent edition being RFC 1340. The hardware type is
- called the Machine Name, and the software type is called the System
- Name.
-
- The information users supply about this is often inconsistent or
- incomplete. Please follow the terms in the current "Assigned
- Numbers".
-
- 4.3.5 PTR Records
-
- A Domain Name Pointer record, PTR, allows special names to point to
- some other location in the domain data base. These are typically
- used in setting up reverse pointers for the special IN-ADDR.ARPA
- domain. PTR names should be unique to the zone.
-
- 0.0.9.128.in-addr.arpa PTR isi-net.isi.edu.
- (special name) (real name)
-
- A PTR record is to be added to the IN-ADDR.ARPA domain for every A
- record registered in the US Domain. These PTR records need to be
- added by the administrator of the network where the host is
- connected. The US Domain administration does not administer the
- network and cannot make these entries in the DNS database.
-
- 4.4 Wildcards
-
- The wildcard records are of the form "*.<anydomain>", where
- <anydomain> is any domain name. The wildcards potentially apply to
- descendents of <anydomain>, but not to <anydomain> itself.
-
- For example, suppose a large company located in California with a
- large, non-IP/TCP, network wanted to create a mail gateway. If the
- company was called DWP.LA.CA.US, and the IP/TCP capable gateway
- machine (Internet forwarder) was called ELROY.JPL.NASA.GOV, the
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 23]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- following RRs might be entered into the .US zone.
-
- dwp.la.ca.us MX 10 ELROY.JPL.NASA.GOV
- *.dwp.la.ca.us MX 10 ELROY.JPL.NASA.GOV
-
- The wildcard record *.DWP.LA.CA.US would cause an MX query for any
- domain name ending in DWP.LA.CA.US to return an MX RR pointing at
- ELROY.JPL.NASA.GOV. The entry without the "*" is needed so the host
- dwp can be found.
-
- In the US Domain, wildcard records are allowed in our zone files
- under the organizational subdomain (and where noted otherwise) but no
- wildcard records are allowed under the "City" or "State" domain.
-
- The authors strongly believe that it is in everyone's
- interest and good for the Internet to have each host
- explicitly registered (that is, we believe that wildcards
- should not be used), we also realize that not everyone
- agrees with this belief. Thus, we will allow wildcard
- records in the US Domain under groups or organizations.
- For example, *.DWP.LA.CA.US.
-
- The reason we feel single entries are the best is by the mere
- fact that if anyone wanted to find one of the hosts in the
- domain name system it would be there, and problems can be
- detected more easily. When using wildcards records all the
- hosts under a subdomain are hidden.
-
- 5. REFERENCES
-
- [1] Stahl, M., "Domain Administrators Guide", RFC 1032, SRI
- International, November 1987.
-
- [2] Lottor, M., "Domain Administrators Operations Guide" RFC 1033,
- SRI International, November 1987.
-
- [3] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities",
- STD 13, RFC 1034, ISI, November 1987.
-
- [4] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Implementation and
- Specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, ISI, November 1987.
-
- [5] Dunlap, K., "Name Server Operations Guide for Bind,
- Release 4.3", UC Berkeley, SMM:11-3.
-
- [6] Partridge, C., "Mail Routing and the Domain Name System",
- STD 14, RFC 974, BBN, January 1986.
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 24]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- 6. SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
- 7. AUTHORS' ADDRESSES
-
- Ann Cooper
- USC/Information Sciences Institute
- 4676 Admiralty Way
- Marina del Rey, CA 90292
-
- Phone: 1-310-822-1511
- Email: cooper@isi.edu
-
-
- Jon Postel
- USC/Information Sciences Institute
- 4676 Admiralty Way
- Marina del Rey, CA 90292
-
- Phone: 1-310-822-1511
- Email: postel@isi.edu
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 25]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- APPENDIX-I: US DOMAIN NAMES BNF
- ================================
-
- <us-domain-name> ::= <us-name><dot><us>
-
- <us-name> ::= <state-name><dot><state-code> |
- <fed-name><dot><fed>
-
- <state-code> ::= <the two-letter code of a state from the
- zip code directory>
-
- <state-name> ::= <local-name><dot><locality> |
- <state-agency-name><dot><state> |
- <regional-agency-name><dot><agency>
-
- <fed-name> ::= <the dotted hierarchical name of a US
- federal government agency>
-
- <locality> ::= <the full name of a city from the
- zip code directory> |
- <a short code name for a city> |
- <the full name of a county, township,
- or parish> |
- <other well known and commonly used
- locality name>
-
- <local-name> ::= <entity-name> |
- <city-name><dot><city> |
- <county-name><dot><county> |
- <local-agency-name><dot><agency>
-
- <state-agency-name> ::= <the dotted hierarchical name of a state
- government agency>
-
- <regional-agency-name> ::= <the dotted hierarchical name of a special
- agency or district not an element of the
- state government and typically larger than
- a single city or county, for example, the
- Southern California Air Quality Management
- District>
-
- <entity-name> ::= <the dotted hierarchical name of an entity
- within a city, for example: a company,
- business, private school, club, organization,
- or individual>
-
- <city-name> ::= <the dotted hierarchical name of a city
- government agency>
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 26]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- <county-name> ::= <the dotted hierarchical name of a county,
- township, or parish government agency>
-
- <local-agency-name> ::= <the dotted hierarchical name of a special
- agency or district not an element of a
- city or county government and typically
- equal or smaller than a single city or
- county, for example, the Bunker Hill
- Improvement District>
-
-
- <city> ::= "CITY"
-
- <county> ::= "COUNTY" | "TOWNSHIP" | "PARISH"
-
- <dot> ::= "."
-
- <fed> ::= "FED"
-
- <agency> ::= "AGENCY" | "DISTRICT" | "K12" | "CC" | "LIB"
-
- <state> ::= "STATE" | "COMMONWEALTH"
-
- <us> ::= "US"
-
-
- Note: "K12" may be used for public school districts, only.
- and "CC" may be used only for public community colleges,
- and "LIB" can only be used by libraries.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 27]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- APPENDIX-II: US DOMAIN QUESTIONNAIRE FOR HOST ENTRY
-
-
- To register a host in the US domain, the following information must be
- sent to the US Domain Registrar (Us-Domain@ISI.EDU). Questions may be
- sent by electronic mail to the above address, or by phone to
- Ann Cooper (310-822-1511).
-
-
- (1) The name of the top-level domain to join.
-
- For example: US
-
-
- (2) The name of the administrative head of the organization, including
- title, mailing address, phone number, organization, and network
- mailbox. This is the contact point for administrative and policy
- questions about the domain. In the case of a research project,
- this should be the principal investigator.
-
- For example:
-
- Administrator
-
- Organization The NetWorthy Corporation
- Name Penelope Q. Sassafrass
- Title President
- Mail Address The NetWorthy Corporation
- 4676 Andrews Way, Suite 100
- Santa Clara, CA 94302-1212
- Phone Number (415) 123-4567
- Net Mailbox Sassafrass@ECHO.TNC.COM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 28]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- (3) The name of the technical contact for the entry, including title,
- mailing address, phone number, organization, and network mailbox.
- This is the contact point for problems concerning the domain or
- zone, as well as for updating information about the domain or zone.
-
- For example:
-
- Technical Contact
-
- Organization The NetWorthy Corporation
- Name Ansel A. Aardvark
- Title Executive Director
- Mail Address The NetWorthy Corporation
- 4676 Andrews Way, Suite 100
- Santa Clara, CA. 94302-1212
- Phone Number (415) 123-6789
- Net Mailbox Aardvark@ECHO.TNC.COM
-
-
- (4) The name of the host. This is the name that will be used in tables
- and lists associating the domain with the domain server addresses.
- [While, from a technical standpoint, domain names can be quite long
- (programmers beware), shorter names are easier for people to cope
- with.]
-
- For example: NetWorthy.Santa-Clara.CA.US
-
- Or: Alpha.NetWorthy.Santa-Clara.CA.US
- Beta.NetWorthy.Santa-Clara.CA.US
-
-
- (5) If this machine is not directly on the internet, how does it
- communicate with the Internet. Through UUCP, CREN, etc? Which
- forwarding host?
-
- For example: The host "Networthy.Santa-Clara.CA.US" uses UUCP
- to connect to "RELAY.ISI.EDU" which is an Internet host.
-
- The administrator of RELAY.ISI.EDU must agree to be the
- forwarding host for Networthy.Santa-Clara.CA.US, and the
- forwarding host must know a delivery method and route to it.
- No double MXing.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 29]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- If you are requesting an indirect connection, that is, a Mail
- Exchanger (MX) record, what is the name and mailbox of the
- administrator of the forwarding host.
-
- For example:John Smith
- js@RELAY.ISI.EDU
-
-
- (6) Please describe your organization briefly.
-
- For example: The NetWorthy Corporation is a consulting
- organization of people working with UNIX and the C language in an
- electronic networking environment. It sponsors two technical
- conferences annually and distributes a bimonthly newsletter.
-
-
- (7) What Domain Name System (DNS) Resource Records (RR) and values are
- to be entered.
-
- a. A Internet Address (internet hosts only)
- b. HINFO Host Information, Machine System
- c. WKS Well Known Services, Protocols, Ports (internet hosts only)
- d. MX Mail Exchanger (required for UUCP, and CREN hosts)
-
- An example of RRs for an internet host.
-
- NetWorthy.Santa-Clara.CA.US IN A 128.9.3.123
- IN HINFO SUN-3/11OC UNIX
- IN MX 10 ISI.EDU
- IN WKS 128.9.3.123. UDP (echo
- tftp)
- IN WKS 128.9.3.133. TCP (telnet
- ftp
- tftp
- finger)
-
- An example of RRs for a non-internet host.
-
- Beta.NetWorthy.Santa-Clara.CA.US MX 10 RELAY.ISI.EDU
- HINFO SUN-3/11OC UNIX
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 30]
-
- RFC 1386 The US Domain December 1992
-
-
- (8) Where is the IN-ADDR pointer record to be entered. (For internet
- hosts only.) It is your responsibility to see that this is done.
- Contact the administrator of the IP network your host is on. The
- US Domain administration does not administer the network and cannot
- make these entries in the DNS database.
-
- For example:
-
- 123.3.9.128.IN-ADDR.ARPA. PTR NetWorthy.Santa-Clara.CA.US
-
- Who is the contact for the zone of the IN-ADDR.ARPA data, where
- this record will be entered?
-
-
- (9) What Time to Live (TTL)? TTL is the time (in seconds) that a
- resolver will use the data it got from the domain server before it
- asks it again for the data. A typical TTL is One Week 604800.
- (NOTE: TTL is not applicable to non-Internet hosts.)
-
- For example:
-
- One Week 604800
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cooper & Postel [Page 31]
-